Council member blames ballot measure for forcing yes vote on housing 
Developer Andrew Esposito made clear that if the City Council shot down his firm’s proposal for a 248-unit housing development in Queens, he would look to a three-person appeals board to revive the project. But that ultimately wasn’t necessary. To ensure local Council member Vickie Paladino’s approval, Apex and co-developer Barrone Management offered some concessions, including adding more parking than required at 217-14 24th Avenue. The developers also wouldn’t add density, Esposito said, even though the passage of the City of Yes for Housing Opportunity text amendment paved the way for another floor to the eight-story building. The developers also […]
This article originally appeared on The Real Deal. Click here to read the full story.
Categories
Recent Posts

“Freak accident”: Pfizer building developer denies risk of
collapse

Deal Diary: The $80K Deal That Turned Into a 24-Unit
Building

Policy Pro: HPD floats 421a rule change to keep more
projects alive

Meet the developers behind the Pfizer building
conversion

NYCHA plumber’s $465K payday sparks probe into outside
work

Michael Shabsels lists Westhampton home for $75K a
month

Buckling ex-Pfizer HQ hit with multiple DOB violations last
year

Namdar Group grabs additional financing in Jersey
City

Prana Investments’ NYC multifamily portfolio faces 14
foreclosure lawsuits

Vacant rent-stabilized apartment rate climbs despite
persistent housing shortage


